Written by Tulika Majumder
Table of Contents
Yes, POSH is very much a part of corporate administration.
What is POSH? POSH stands for the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 in India. It is a mandatory legal compliance requirement for every employer (including companies, firms, NGOs, educational institutions, etc.) in India.
Why is it part of Corporate Administration? Corporate administration encompasses governance, compliance, risk management, HR policies, and internal controls. POSH directly falls under these areas because:
- Legal Compliance & Statutory Obligation
Every organization with 10 or more employees must constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC). Failure to do so attracts heavy penalties (₹50,000 to ₹1,00,000+ and possible cancellation of business licenses). - Governance & Policy Framework
Companies are required to:- Frame a POSH Policy
- Display it at conspicuous places
- Include it in the employee handbook / code of conduct
- Conduct awareness sessions and training (this is now a standard agenda in board/HR committee meetings)
- HR & Administration Role
The HR/Admin head is usually the custodian of POSH implementation. The ICC is often chaired by a senior woman employee and includes external independent members. - Risk Management & Audit
POSH compliance is now checked during:- Internal audits
- Secretarial audits (Form MR-3)
- Due diligence in M&A, funding rounds, or IPOs
- ISO certifications and ESG reporting
Key Responsibilities in Corporate Administration | Area | POSH-related Duty | |———————–|——————————————–| | Board / Management | Ensure constitution of ICC & policy approval | | HR / Admin | Training, awareness, annual reports | | Legal / Compliance | Policy drafting, investigation support | | Finance | Budget for training & external member fees | | IT / Admin | Safe reporting channels (email, portal) |
In Practice (India) – Listed companies and large corporates treat POSH as a key governance item. – Many companies now have a POSH Compliance Certificate signed by the Compliance Officer. – It is regularly covered in Corporate Governance Reports and Business Responsibility & Sustainability Reporting (BRSR).
Bottom line: POSH is not just an HR issue — it is a core corporate compliance and administration function in India. Ignoring it can lead to legal, financial, and reputational risks for the company and its directors. Here’s a clear, step-by-step guide on how to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) in India.
- Who Must Constitute an ICC?
- Every employer (company, firm, LLP, NGO, educational institution, etc.) employing 10 or more employees (including contractual, temporary, interns, etc., on any day in the preceding 12 months).
- This applies to each workplace (head office, branches, regional offices).
- Even if you have multiple locations, you may need separate ICCs or one that covers all, depending on feasibility.
Penalty for non-compliance: Fine up to ₹50,000 for the first offence; double for repeat offences + possible cancellation of business licence/registration.
- Composition of the ICC (Minimum 4 Members) The employer must nominate members by an order in writing. Key requirements:
| Role | Requirements | Notes |
| Presiding Officer (Chairperson) | Senior-level woman employee | Mandatory. She leads the committee. |
| Employee Members | At least 2 employees (preferably committed to women’s causes, social work, or with legal knowledge) | At least half of the total ICC members must be women. |
| External Member | One person from an NGO/association committed to women’s causes or familiar with sexual harassment issues | Must not be from the same organisation. Can be paid ₹200/day + travel. |
- Tenure: Maximum 3 years from the date of nomination.
- Quorum: Usually 3 members (including Presiding Officer) for meetings/inquiries.
- If any member faces a complaint or has a conflict, they must be replaced immediately.
- Step-by-Step Process to Constitute the ICC
- Assess Requirement
Count all employees (full-time, part-time, contractual). If ≥10, proceed. - Identify & Nominate Members
- Select a senior woman employee as Presiding Officer.
- Choose 2+ suitable internal members.
- Engage a suitable external member (NGOs like those empanelled by state women’s commissions work well).
- Ensure at least 50% women overall.
- Issue Formal Constitution Order
- Prepare a written order signed by the employer/authorised signatory.
- Include: Names, designations, contact details, roles, and effective date.
- Mention tenure (up to 3 years).
- Adopt POSH Policy (Mandatory alongside ICC)
- Draft a comprehensive Anti-Sexual Harassment Policy.
- Define sexual harassment, complaint procedure, timelines (inquiry within 90 days), confidentiality, and penalties.
- Display & Communicate
- Display ICC members’ names & contact details prominently at the workplace.
- Include in employee handbook, offer letters, intranet, and onboarding.
- Conduct mandatory awareness training/sensitisation programmes.
- Register on SHE-Box (Recommended/Required in many states)
- Register the ICC on the Ministry of Women & Child Development’s SHE-Box portal: https://shebox.wcd.gov.in
- This helps with centralised tracking.
- File Annual Report
- ICC must submit an annual report to the employer (and District Officer if applicable) by 31st January every year (details of complaints received, disposed, etc.).
Sample Constitution Order Format (Simple) Order No. XXX / Date
Constitution of Internal Complaints Committee under POSH Act, 2013
The following members are hereby nominated to constitute the Internal Complaints Committee effective from [Date]:
- Presiding Officer: Ms. ABC, Designation, Contact
- Member: Mr./Ms. DEF, Designation, Contact
- Member: Mr./Ms. GHI, Designation, Contact
- External Member: Ms. JKL (from NGO XYZ), Contact
Signed:
[Employer/Authorised Signatory]
Additional Best Practices – Provide training to ICC members on inquiry procedures, natural justice principles, confidentiality, and timelines. – Maintain records of all complaints, inquiries, and actions (confidential). – Review and reconstitute the ICC before the 3-year tenure ends. – For multi-location companies, ensure coverage for all sites.
This is a mandatory statutory compliance that protects both employees and the organisation.
.History Behind POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013)
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 — commonly known as the POSH Act — is a landmark legislation in India. It did not emerge in isolation but was the result of decades of activism, judicial intervention, and societal pressure. Here’s a clear chronological overview:
- Pre-1990s: No Specific Law
- Sexual harassment at the workplace was not explicitly recognised as a legal offence in India.
- Cases were handled under general provisions of the Indian Penal Code (e.g., Section 354 for outraging modesty, Section 509 for insulting modesty of a woman), which were inadequate, vague, and rarely enforced.
- Women’s movements in the 1970s–80s highlighted workplace harassment, but there was no dedicated framework.
- The Turning Point: Bhanwari Devi Case (1992)
- Bhanwari Devi, a social worker (saathin) in Rajasthan, was gang-raped in 1992 by upper-caste men as retaliation for her efforts to stop child marriage.
- The trial court acquitted the accused in 1995, citing lack of evidence and caste-related arguments.
- This shocking acquittal triggered nationwide outrage and highlighted the vulnerability of women working in public roles.
- Vishaka Guidelines (1997) – Judicial Activism
- In response, a group of NGOs (including Vishaka) filed a Public Interest Litigation (Vishaka & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) before the Supreme Court.
- On 13 August 1997, the Supreme Court delivered a historic judgment. Since there was no legislation, the Court exercised its power under Article 32 and laid down legally binding “Vishaka Guidelines” for preventing and redressing sexual harassment at workplaces.
- Key features of Vishaka Guidelines:
- Defined sexual harassment.
- Mandated employers to set up Complaint Committees (forerunners of ICC).
- Laid down preventive measures, inquiry procedures, and employer duties.
- Applied to both government and private sectors.
These guidelines remained the primary law of the land for 16 years (1997–2013) and were treated as law under Article 141 of the Constitution.
- Post-Vishaka Developments (1997–2012)
- Several Supreme Court and High Court judgments reinforced and expanded the guidelines (e.g., Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A.K. Chopra, Medha Kotwal Lele case).
- The National Commission for Women and women’s groups pushed for legislation.
- Multiple drafts were prepared, but the Bill faced delays due to bureaucratic and political hurdles.
- High-profile incidents (including cases in media, corporates, and educational institutions) kept the issue alive in public discourse.
- Enactment of the POSH Act (2013)
- The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Bill, 2012 was introduced in Parliament.
- It received Presidential assent on 9 December 2013 and came into force on 9 December 2013 itself (with Rules notified shortly after).
- The Act codified the Vishaka Guidelines, expanded their scope, introduced penalties for non-compliance, and provided a comprehensive framework.
- Key Objectives of the Act
- Prevent sexual harassment.
- Protect women’s right to equality, dignity, and safe working conditions (Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution).
- Provide a time-bound redressal mechanism.
- Impose duties on employers (especially constitution of Internal Complaints Committee where 10+ employees).
Evolution After 2013 – SHE-Box Portal launched in 2017 by the Ministry of Women and Child Development for online complaints. – Amendments and clarifications over the years (e.g., coverage of domestic workers, students in some interpretations, remote work scenarios post-COVID). – Increased focus on awareness, training, and compliance audits, especially in corporates. – The Act remains a living legislation, with courts continuing to interpret and strengthen it.
Why It Matters Today The POSH Act transformed sexual harassment from a “personal issue” to a workplace accountability and governance matter. It places the onus on employers to create safe environments and has significantly empowered women in the organised workforce.
In short:
Bhanwari Devi’s courage → Vishaka Guidelines (1997) → 16 years of judicial governance → POSH Act 2013.
Vishaka Guidelines vs POSH Act 2013: A Clear Comparison
The Vishaka Guidelines (1997) were a landmark judicial intervention by the Supreme Court, while the POSH Act (Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013) is a comprehensive statutory law enacted by Parliament that built upon and replaced the Guidelines.
Key Comparison Table
| Aspect | Vishaka Guidelines (1997) | POSH Act 2013 | Improvement in POSH Act |
| Legal Status | Judicial directions under Article 141 (binding on all courts and authorities until legislation) | Full-fledged Act of Parliament with Rules and penalties | Stronger enforceability and parliamentary backing |
| Definition of Sexual Harassment | Broadly described with examples (physical contact, demands for favours, remarks, pornography, etc.) | Statutorily defined under Section 2(n) – more precise and exhaustive | Clearer, legally enforceable definition |
| Applicability / Coverage | Public & private workplaces; focus on employees | All workplaces (organised & unorganised sectors), domestic workers, interns, trainees, students (in some contexts), visitors, extended workplace (travel, client sites, virtual) | Much wider scope |
| Protected Persons | Primarily women employees | Any aggrieved woman (not necessarily an employee) – includes third-party complaints | Broader protection |
| Redressal Mechanism | Complaints Committee (headed by woman, with NGO member recommended) | Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) for organisations with 10+ employeesLocal Complaints Committee (LCC) at district level for smaller setups or complaints against employer | Structured, tiered mechanism with clear rules |
| Timelines | No strict deadlines | Inquiry to be completed in 90 days; report in 10 days; action by employer in 60 days | Time-bound process |
| Employer Duties | Preventive steps, set up committee, awareness | Mandatory ICC constitution, policy, training, annual reports, display of policy, penalties for non-compliance | Detailed obligations + accountability |
| Penalties for Employer | None specified (relied on contempt or other laws) | Fine up to ₹50,000 (doubled for repeat offences) + possible licence cancellation | Strong deterrence |
| Inquiry Process | Broad principles of natural justice | Detailed procedure: conciliation (optional), notice, inquiry, interim relief, confidentiality, appeal provisions | More robust & victim-friendly |
| External Member | Recommended | Mandatory in ICC | Standardised |
| Annual Reporting | Not mandated | Mandatory Annual Report by ICC | Better monitoring |
Main Strengths of Vishaka Guidelines – Filled a legislative vacuum for 16 years (1997–2013). – Established sexual harassment as a violation of fundamental rights (Articles 14, 15, 19 & 21). – Introduced the concepts of quid pro quo and hostile work environment. – Placed responsibility on employers.
How POSH Act Improved Upon Vishaka – Codified and expanded the Guidelines into enforceable law. – Added detailed definitions, procedures, penalties, and safeguards. – Introduced Local Complaints Committees for unorganised sectors and domestic workers. – Recognised extended workplace (e.g., during business travel, off-site meetings, virtual platforms). – Provided mechanisms for false/malicious complaints and interim relief. – Made compliance auditable (especially important for corporates during audits, funding, or IPOs).
What Remained Similar Both follow the three-pronged approach: Prevention – Prohibition – Redressal.
Both emphasise employer responsibility, confidentiality, and natural justice principles.
Current Position (2026) – The POSH Act fully supersedes the Vishaka Guidelines. – Courts still refer to Vishaka for interpretation where the Act is silent, but day-to-day compliance is governed entirely by the 2013 Act and Rules.
This evolution from judicial guidelines to a detailed statute reflects India’s progress in institutionalising gender justice at the workplace.